A fresh thread to discuss the case...

Thanks Ben.

Oh boy oh boy...another new thread.

Dang it third this time

Geez, I wish there would be some warning before this happens.

New threads are nice. Like starting a whole new life after ending the old one. Well, gotta go now. You guys have a good one.

new and good article by Jan Barrett

Caylee Anthony-IS FATBOY jose biazz a bit worried???

http://www.bloggernews.net/121608

i remember when there was of 10,000 people reading her aticles wish it was still so

glad she reemed Casey ABOUT BE NO!!!!! PRINCESS...WITCH SHE CALLED HER AND RIGHTFULLY SO!! my title for her will always stand

The Vile Blackhearted Witch Of Lies!!!!


forever and always sweet Caylee Marie♥♥♥♥

I must admit that I am stunned. I just read downstairs that, Although he has entered a not guilty plea on behalf of his client for the check fraud charges, Jose Baez sent a money order from his office to the bank to reimburse them for the money Casey allegedly stole. The bank acknowledges receipt of this payment from Baez in a letter stating that "Bank of America did not take this payment in lieu of criminal prosecution":

http://www.wftv.com/pdf/20090214/detail.html
(credit for this link to darcydoodle)

Baez then attaches that letter to a motion he filed regarding the check fraud case!

I was going to post a lawyer joke, but Jose has made it redundant for me to do that.

uhhhh i'm only away a few days and return to find everything changed! new thread, well ok

HELLO everyone, i hope all are well

Some, thanks for the info, smooth move by baez, make resitution and they usually don't follow through on the charges, what's the point, his client goes into court on these charges and it's already been repaid, a jury will look at that, as in where's the big deal now she made restitution (shrug)

i do, however, thoroughly enjoy his idiocy in attaching the letter that the bank will still pursue the criminal charges to his motion, good grief his stupidity seems to gain confidence as it rolls along (shaking my head)

All I can say about the post somethoughts has about Baez is.......WOW what an idiot. LOL

I am glad the bank didnt take the payment and sweep it under the rug! Bout time money didnt prevail! woooowhooooooooo

quote:

Jose Baez sent a money order from his office to the bank

This is just plain wierd. Did he think that'd make it all just go away, those check fraud charges?

Jan Barret rocks! Thanks for the link.

Morning everybody,

yes, Neid...thanks for the link to article by Jan Barret. Talk about, 'telling it, like it is!"

quote:

Posted 07-19-09 10:56 AM Hide Post
quote:
Jose Baez sent a money order from his office to the bank

At the very least, this seems really unethical. No wonder Judge Strickland filed a complaint about him. How unprofessional can you get? Banks letter was basically saying, um..yeah, well thanks but no thanks, she's going to court fool, wtf is wrong with this guy? I wish Strickland would strike him from this case so she doesn't try to say years from now, with some other attorney, that she had ineffective council.

Not only did this not work for our friend Jose, but it completely blew up in his face! (pretty much like everything else he does) Now the question is why would he pay restitution if his client is not guilty? There is a possibility that no one would have known he did this, but he ratted himself out by attaching the proof of his payment to a motion he filed!

Since he has now effectively thrown the case, maybe she should just plead guilty and take her sentence. Then they can devote their time to defending the murder case (which is why they say they wanted the trial delayed in the first place.)

I wouldn't want an idiot like that defending me on a jaywalking charge! Isn't Lyon supposed to keep him from doing stupid things? I guess he did it on a day other than Thursday or Friday when she was busy teaching class.