our networks
tlcanimal planetthe science channel
site search
shop now
discovery channel
 
Message Boards
    Forums    Discovery Channel    DC: VIEWER IDEAS    Why I believe that "Quest for the Future" would be great.
Go
New
Find
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Senior Member
Registered: 07-28-04
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Basically, I cruise YouTube and Google Video and Magnet Motors, Over Unity, and anything along those guidelines do get a large number of hits. But, there isn't really a show anywhere on television that really addresses any of these designs, devices, nor attempts to build any. I've seen people doing anything from digging up old patents to test, all the way through showing off some device that for some reason, they cannot explain.

I do see a patern in it. Most of the devices you really see working, the guy is talking about God, and doesn't really know anything about electronics. Over an over again, I keep seeing this one electric motor, and it does come down to some real working physics.

In designing a transformer, it's easy to see a transformer go into magnetic satuaration. That can be 2.2 Teslas with certain core materials. A permanent neodymium magnet that measure 1.5 inches in diameter and 3/4rs of an inch thick really has about 0.68 teslas there. It can lift over 100lbs. The energy in and out of a transformer based upon conversion can be upwards towards 98% efficient. At that point, the core is magnetized and potentially as has as 80 to 90% of saturation.

So, the make bows and arrows the same way in China, as they do in Egypt and America. They make blow dart guns the same way in South America as they do in parts of Africa and Madagascar. So, if there is a God, some of the tools are made the same way because, the same engineer is behind them. Before trade, I consider the history of technology quite important. But, when it's obvious that God's not speaking for himself, I don't and won't listen.

If Neuman, and several others would have taken the time to go to college, and then took what they had heard from God, they would have been able to explain it. But, there are three instances of where the way they explain it, isn't the way anything could work, unless they are renaming already known and understood terms.

If the motor were a transformer by design before motion and horsepower became an issue in the design of the motor, yes, and AC motor is likely to operate over unity because, transformer core losses would be the only losses in the system, which is only 2 to 10% per core if properly designed.

Squirrel cage motors, and induction motors are good examples of how the electric motor can be designed around using transformer physics, but the secondary is shorted and there is no realistic way to extract the power. It can be done using a 1:1 bifilar transformer when the primary winding is used as the coil in a series resonant circuit tuned to the frequency of AC power applied. Then you want an AC converter to work well above 60Hz because, transformers are not as effecient at lower frequencies. Nor are notch filters like the one you would need to act as a short circuit when unloaded, and serve as a short when loaded.

I highly doubt you people these days. Because, there is no engineer really viewing this, and the moderators have no formal education in the field of Electronics, and really feel safe to assume that they know enough to make a real judgement call when they don't.
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    Forums    Discovery Channel    DC: VIEWER IDEAS    Why I believe that "Quest for the Future" would be great.

Picture(s): DCL |

By visiting this site, you agree to the terms and conditions
of our Visitor Agreement. Please read. Privacy Policy.
Copyright © 2008 Discovery Communications, LLC.

The number-one nonfiction media company.