I believe man is too blame . Over the past 1000yrs the CO2 emissions have increases drastically to 300 parts per million ! have u ever watched a documentary titled " An Inconvenient Truth" ? I suggest you do . This factually states why is it that humans is too blame and is very disturbing yet fascinating!
excuse me senior americanman ? u really think that people play no role in global warming? if so then look to the evidence ...........take for example the polar icecaps breaking of and yrs ago this was not so! then y is it so now? take note the co2 emissions each yr and compare then with the melting of the polar icecaps.
I was PackLeader but something happend to my computer so now I'am PackLeader2.Hi everyone I think its nature and people but what the science channel is saying is, we are all going to die! but were not because we would all be died now.right!
My famile and I love God so if something bad happens I will tell my famiy to trust ONLY God and to never give up!!!! may God be with you allways!!!-PackLeader2
Originally posted by packleader2: My famile and I love God so if something bad happens I will tell my famiy to trust ONLY God and to never give up!!!! may God be with you allways!!!-PackLeader2
yeah I heared about 12/21/2012 and I'am not scared that much because in the Bible God says no one can predict when time will end.and in this paper at wal-mart said this on the front page:the myan time table is an UFO! and I said to my self what gerks!!but what I do know is that the earth will end sometime soon.
in the 4.5 billion years of this planets life it has been through more changes that we can imagine and will continue to do so no matter what we do, and if we are here or not. Yes humans don't help but turning the temprature on the washing machine down 10 degrees won't do much. If we realy want to do some good we need to cut the human race down a few billion. But which politician would say that, none. So lets just talk about it and pretend that increasing taxes and turning down your heating will make any difference in the long run. Wonder if the dinosaurs had the same thoughts
A mere 10,000 years ago, glaciers in the southern Sierra Nevada Mountains fed large lakes in Death Valley. Just approximately 50 miles to the west of Death Valley, in nearby Panamint Valley, the glaciers still existed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_age
Humans may contribute to global warming, but we are certainly not sole cause. However, I wish the USA was serious about tapping renewable fuels. We have an "ocean" of wind and solar in the Midwest and our deserts, but we continue to feed/fund the weapons and terrorist programs the very "oil rich" countries that seek to harm us most. We need to stop this dependence immediately.
We need a multi-phased approach to accomplish this change. We need to "refine" solar/wind energy into hydrogen or electricity. Auto manufacturers need to convert to the chosen technology instead of "just" refined fossil fuels. Let’s tap America's future now and create modernized research & development, re-establish good paying jobs! The biggest benefit; we stop exporting our money overseas!
Originally posted by icykev312: Who do you all belive is to have the finger pointed too Humans or Nature or Mankind? Insight please..
With all due respect, mankind IS humans,...and we're part of Nature. So the question itself is as meaningless as this new religion of global warming alarmism.
What I have to wonder is why no "believers" ever take into account the hundreds of eminent professors and atmospheric scientists who insist that the overwhelming preponderance of the evidence clearly indicates Man is NOT to blame, that the cycle has been going on for millennia since before we arrived and will continue to do so long after we're gone. What is these scientists' supposed motivation to "mislead" the public? You would have to convince yourself that every single one of them is on some big oil company payroll; that's a cop-out. These men and women are risking their professorships and teaching positions at universities, their ability to get published, their credibility and integrity are on the line every day, all in the name of having the true information be known. It bucks the trend and the people on the other side, who by contrast have political agendas and power and trillions of dollars at stake in the form of exorbitantly expensive (yet ultimately futile) "fixes" to global warming if enough of the masses can be led to "believe" in it.
All I'm saying is, honestly listen to all ethe evidence from BOTH sides before making up your mind. And then, keep that mind open in case future information comes along that supplants the current level of knowledge. When a rational, logical person encounters new and credible, substantial information that trumps their prior knowledge base, they instantly change their mind. What do you do?
