Ok I will make it an official thread.

The list of things watson has done against whaling, and other endeavors, is well documented.
What has he done in the positive?
I expect a very short list. The conservation society, does not conserve very much.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...2/25/DSC_0564_sm.jpg


yay

quote:

Originally posted by steelpeeler52:
Ok I will make it an official thread.

The list of things watson has done against whaling, and other endeavors, is well documented.
What has he done in the positive?
I expect a very short list. The conservation society, does not conserve very much.

Apparently he does more than someone just posting on a forum. I am quite sure his accomplishments are more than typing on a keyboard.

He hasn't done any "good". Even when his goals are good he still chooses to achieve those goals through dishonorable actions and deeds.

quote:

Originally posted by winpooh718:

quote:

Originally posted by steelpeeler52:
Ok I will make it an official thread.

The list of things watson has done against whaling, and other endeavors, is well documented.
What has he done in the positive?
I expect a very short list. The conservation society, does not conserve very much.

Apparently he does more than someone just posting on a forum. I am quite sure his accomplishments are more than typing on a keyboard.

Still not answering the question! Trying to change the subject is one of watson tactics.

If you call damaging ships whether he is aboard them or not,injuring people including his own crew and interfering with the lawful commerce on the seas good,I guess Paul Watson HAS done good things.
The problem with that thinking is that if you support it,you support illegal activity.That is exactly what Paul Watson and Co do when they claim to be standing up for animals by throwing things at ships,trying to foul their propellers,close with and ram other ships and fly a helo close enough to be perceived as a threat,even if it isn't intended to launch anything at them.

quote:

Originally posted by winpooh718:

quote:

Originally posted by steelpeeler52:
Ok I will make it an official thread.

The list of things watson has done against whaling, and other endeavors, is well documented.
What has he done in the positive?
I expect a very short list. The conservation society, does not conserve very much.

Apparently he does more than someone just posting on a forum. I am quite sure his accomplishments are more than typing on a keyboard.

buuummp

quote:

Originally posted by EndangeredMan:
He hasn't done any "good". Even when his goals are good he still chooses to achieve those goals through dishonorable actions and deeds.

so he chooses to achieve those goals through dishonorable actions and deeds thats just a fance way of saying he outsmarted them

quote:

Originally posted by jonny1616:

quote:

Originally posted by EndangeredMan:
He hasn't done any "good". Even when his goals are good he still chooses to achieve those goals through dishonorable actions and deeds.

so he chooses to achieve those goals through dishonorable actions and deeds thats just a fance way of saying he outsmarted them

Not really.. If I decide to save all the whales from hunters by shooting every last whale in the world it does not mean I have outsmarted the hunters.

You cannot achieve anything noble, good or honorable by committing indecent acts no matter what those goals are.

yea killing all the whales would not help

I was expecting the Pro-SSCS fanatics to post some sort of list credit watson with something positive?

Seems they cant find anything! There is the problem that anything they might say, would have to be taken with a grain of salt. Considering watsons policy of lieing.

so there not much positive but there something positive or negative and thats more then any one else

quote:

Originally posted by jonny1616:
so there not much positive but there something positive or negative and thats more then any one else

Then list them.

quote:

Originally posted by jonny1616:
so there not much positive but there something positive or negative and thats more then any one else

Will you please proofread your post! Try using CAPITALS at the beginning of sentences. Use periods at the end, they look like this, "."! Use commas "," in conjunctions with conjunctions.

I'm usually not one to nitpick grammatical errors, but your post are very hard to decipher. Try using "Firefox" as a browser, it offers a spell check that works even on these boards without having to C/P into "Word".

Your heart seems in the right place, and proper grammer will help you make your argument. Good luck, and if you need any help, just ask. Feel free to proofread my post also, we all make mistakes.

1.he got a ship
2.he got a crew
3.he went down to antarctica
4.got butyric acid
5.got two little boats and a helicopter
6.set up a show
7.trys to stop whalers
8.makes press releases
9.dedicated meny years try to stop the whalers
10.dose it all with no maygour gouverment support
there is ten