This link was posted by sagebrush in another forum. After reading the article I felt that it needed its separate topic. Please read the article and share your thoughts:

http://www.activistcash.com/or...overview.cfm/oid/347

quote:

Originally posted by iLoveWhaleMeat:
This link was posted by sagebrush in another forum. After reading the article I felt that it needed its separate topic. Please read the article and share your thoughts:

http://www.activistcash.com/or...overview.cfm/oid/347

Wow, that guy is pure evil. I wish someone would take him out of the water once and for all. Please for the love God someone send him to Davie Jones locker!!

Nice compilation of what many of us researched.

It's concerning that those who support an end to whaling have forgone their original intent which was honorable. And now stand firmly alongside a terrorist, anarchist, criminal.

Watson has hijacked their cause and morphed it into his cause. Their devotion to him blind them to this fact.

Terrorist do not start as terrorist they start as activist for their respective cause. They become terrorist through their actions.

I contend that if you support "Watson the Terrorist", then You to are a terrorist!

(crickets chirping) the silence is deafening. This string was viewed 50 times. I'm sure an SS supporter had to of read the article. Yet no response debunking. i think they want this string to just go away. Or maybe their taking this moment to look inside themselves, to see what they have become.

I have read many articles on the infamous PW but all are damaging to his reputation but I must say this article puts the Psycho right up there with to top 5, LOL what a maroooooon!

What disturbs me so is that, I assume, for the most part the majority of the human race plays by the rules, ie: pays taxes, works, supports a family, votes, donates time and money to worthy causes...your basic contributing member
of society....and THEN...

An anarchist creep like Paul Watson is glorified on cable TV for his acts of terrorism, his disregard for international maritime law, AND most importantly, his copmplete and utter disregard for human life.

Very disheartening...I really don't know what AP is thinking. No wonder our society is header for the sh!!!er.

Imho, AP is thinking one thing and one thing only.
profits.

I highly doubt as an entity they could give a rats behind about the issues here. They just care that the show is a hit and the advertisers keep buying time slots so those greenbacks help feed the corporate conglomerate.

Pretty bleak I know, but I believe that is the short and skinny of it.

Still looking for the proof.

quote:

Originally posted by Oztom:
Still looking for the proof.

Proof of what, pray tell..?

quote:

Originally posted by sagebrush57:

quote:

Originally posted by Oztom:
Still looking for the proof.

Proof of what, pray tell..?

You do look at the thread title don't you?

Is there any proof that Paul Watson and the Sea Shepherds are terrorists?

quote:

Originally posted by Oztom:

quote:

Originally posted by sagebrush57:

quote:

Originally posted by Oztom:
Still looking for the proof.

Proof of what, pray tell..?

You do look at the thread title don't you?

quote:

Originally posted by winpooh718:
Is there any proof that Paul Watson and the Sea Shepherds are terrorists?

Did you not watch the final episode? Did you not see Paul Watson intentionally ram the Japanese ship? Did you not see the SS crew throwing toxic acid at the Japanese?

winpooh718 - why do you keep pasting the same post in multiple threads? When it has nothing to do with the thread?

I've reported it to the mods.

I am posting what I deem as a reply to the topic at hand, if it fits into more than one topic, what is the problem?

quote:

Originally posted by White Whale:
winpooh718 - why do you keep pasting the same post in multiple threads? When it has nothing to do with the thread?

I've reported it to the mods.

quote:

Originally posted by winpooh718:
I am posting what I deem as a reply to the topic at hand, if it fits into more than one topic, what is the problem?

Um, ok! But that's sorta like bringing up Star Trek when someone is having a serious discussion about astrophysics.