our networks
tlcanimal planetthe science channelmilitary channelthe health channel
site search
shop now
 

MythBusters

 
    Forums    MythBusters    MythBusters Episode Discussion    Adam's Top 10
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Moderators: mythmod
Go
New
Find
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Senior Member
Registered: 02-18-07
Posts: 1978
Posted   Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I've seen it mentioned in at least one other thread, but perhaps it deserves a thread of its own to make it more visible.

Adam's Top 10 Reasons We Won't Revisit Plane on a Conveyor Belt

Adam's Top 10 Reasons We Won't Revisit Plane on a Conveyor Belt

10. There's no way it's affordable to put a bigger plane on an even bigger conveyor belt.

9. The engineering involved in putting a larger (heavier) plane on a bigger (more durable) conveyor belt and pulling it faster is prohibitive.

8. It would take too much time to put a bigger plane on a conveyor belt. We just don't allot that kind of time to a revisit.

7. A revisit is usually triggered when we get information that is NEW, AND has a (snowball's) chance (in you-know-where) of changing our minds. Neither of those two criteria have happened in this case.

6. If you think we need to show why a plane that's not moving won't take off, you're missing the point.

5. If you think we need to take into account the wind created by the conveyor belt itself, you're missing the point.

4. Jamie thinks it would be a waste of time.

3. I think it would be a waste of time.

2. If you really think about it, we got it right.

1. Come ON! We put a gall-durned actual, honest-to-goodness plane on a bona fide conveyor belt and it TOOK OFF. What MORE do you people WANT?! If you're not satisfied by that, I doubt that anything we could do would help.

(text of link added by MythMod to benefit those with dial up internet access that have problems with the link - MM)

This message has been edited. Last edited by: mythmod,
Senior Member
Registered: 01-03-08
Posts: 518
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I 100% agree with Adam.
Senior Member
Registered: 02-05-08
Posts: 62
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Yeah, I saw this one...

I don't know where you can get a big conveyor belt that will hold a plane that might be almost 1,000 pounds....
Senior Member
Registered: 02-06-08
Posts: 121
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Actually, I understood how the experiment worked from the start, and I agree with the results. I don't know what all the fuss is about. The more you think, logically, about it, the more it seems that you, mythbusters, are right about the plane.
Member
Registered: 03-05-05
Posts: 26
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
People misunderstood the myth, pure and simple.

The myth was NOT "if a plane stood still..."

The myth was, in essence, "CAN a conveyor belt prevent a plane's acceleration."

The answer is NO. Baring mechanical failure, the plan is being pulled from the props, NOT THE WHEELS.



If I put an RC car on a conveyor belt, had the belt moving at 15 MPH, and the car moving at 15 MPH, the car wouldn't move. However, if I attached the car to a fishing pole, and began reeling it to me at 15 MPH, and the conveyor belt was moving at 15 MPH, the car would be moving toward me at 15 MPH. The wheels on the car would be spinning 30 MPH, but since they have nothing to do with what is moving the car toward me, it doesn't matter how fast they spin (up to the point of mechanical failure). If the conveyor belt increased in speed to 30 MPH, all that would happen would be the wheels increase the speed they are spinning to 45 MPH, but they car could keep moving forward.

It doesn't matter how fast the conveyor belt is going. The force applied is STILL wheeling the car 10 MPH toward me. Unless the wheels fail, it's going to move toward me. Simple physics.

This is still one of my favorite myths done to date, one the Mythbusters got absolutely RIGHT (a real rarity, to be sure Wink ).
Senior Member
Registered: 01-31-08
Posts: 252
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by death_mage:
the car moving at 15 MPH, the car wouldn't move.

ummm ... what
Member
Registered: 03-05-05
Posts: 26
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Read the whole sentence.
Senior Member
Registered: 01-31-08
Posts: 252
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by death_mage:
Read the whole sentence.

i did. i also understand what you meant, just trying to get you to see what you are typing

now if you said
If an RC car moving at 15mph drives onto a treadmill moving whose belt is moving at 15mph in the opposite direction, the car will not move
Senior Member
Registered: 02-07-08
Posts: 189
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
although i didn't understand why but i thought it would take off
Senior Member
Registered: 02-07-08
Posts: 189
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by SnarkFish:
quote:
Originally posted by death_mage:
the car moving at 15 MPH, the car wouldn't move.

ummm ... what

i really don't get what u said
Senior Member
Registered: 02-07-08
Posts: 189
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
i agree with Adam 200% i think this is one of the myths that they did it perfectly
Senior Member
Registered: 01-31-08
Posts: 252
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by kiko4life3:
quote:
Originally posted by SnarkFish:
quote:
Originally posted by death_mage:
the car moving at 15 MPH, the car wouldn't move.

ummm ... what

i really don't get what u said

just pointing out that according to the post a moving car is not moving
Member
Registered: 02-08-08
Posts: 10
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
To me honestly, it's really quite ridiculous that this is being discussed so much, and people are actually wanting them to revisit it. The myth was done perfectly. End of story.
Senior Member
Registered: 11-21-07
Posts: 427
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by SnarkFish:
quote:
Originally posted by death_mage:
Read the whole sentence.

i did. i also understand what you meant, just trying to get you to see what you are typing

now if you said
If an RC car moving at 15mph drives onto a treadmill moving whose belt is moving at 15mph in the opposite direction, the car will not move


Yes it would. A car doing 15 is doing 15. A car would only be less effective.
A goat on a conveyor doing the same speed will walk off the belt
Senior Member
Registered: 01-31-08
Posts: 252
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Ishta:
quote:
Originally posted by SnarkFish:
quote:
Originally posted by death_mage:
Read the whole sentence.

i did. i also understand what you meant, just trying to get you to see what you are typing

now if you said
If an RC car moving at 15mph drives onto a treadmill moving whose belt is moving at 15mph in the opposite direction, the car will not move


Yes it would. A car doing 15 is doing 15. A car would only be less effective.
A goat on a conveyor doing the same speed will walk off the belt

the guy i was quoting was talking about a treadmill keeping a car stationary. the one in the example has a constant speed.
Member
Registered: 03-05-05
Posts: 26
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
What we have here is a failure to educate.


Myth busted, done correctly, plane flies, if you think otherwise you simply don't understand what's going on and by this point you never will. Willful ignorance of the highest magnitude. You have to strive to be that dumb.

You make baby Darwin cry.
Senior Member
Registered: 11-10-04
Posts: 85
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I think, if they EVER have to redo this one, they should use a F-15 and a fleet of semis to pull the conveyor. But that's just me.
Senior Member
Registered: 01-18-04
Posts: 1382
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
"Jane! Stop this crazy thing!!!"

--George Jetson
Junior Member
Registered: 02-12-08
Posts: 3
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
It worked awesome. It was cool. Only the Mythbusters could do that. Amazing Big Grin
Junior Member
Registered: 07-12-06
Posts: 4
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
As a pilot, this was a no-brainer to me. Planes fly because of their motion relative to the air, not relative to the ground. With enough of a head wind, a plane doesn't have to be moving relative to the ground to take off.
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  
 

    Forums    MythBusters    MythBusters Episode Discussion    Adam's Top 10

 
advertisement
 
SITE SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
CREDITS DCL
DISCOVERY SITES Discovery Channel / TLC / Animal Planet / Discovery Health / Science Channel / Planet Green / Discovery Kids / Military Channel /
Investigation Discovery / Discovery Home / HD Theater / Turbo / FitTV / HowStuffWorks / TreeHugger / Petfinder / PetVideo / Discovery Education
VIDEO Discovery Channel Video Player
SHOP Toys / Games / Telescopes / DVD Sets / Planet Earth DVD Sets / Gift Ideas
CUSTOMER SERVICE Contact Us / Free Newsletters / RSS / Sitemap / TV FAQs
CORPORATE Discovery Communications, LLC / Advertising / Careers @ Discovery / Privacy Policy / Visitor Agreement
ATTENTION! We recently updated our privacy policy. The changes are effective as of Tuesday, October 30, 2007. To see the new policy, click here. Questions? See the policy for the contact information.