quote:
Originally posted by christi7df:
quote:
If you genuinely believe that a plane would take off from a treadmill with no airspeed (no air velocity over the wings to produce aerodynamic lift)
I think almost no one believes that. Watch the show when it comes out and watch the airplane fly.
Are you suggesting that everyone with knowledge of the principals of aerodynamic flight who are asserting that ground-speed without air-speed does not equal aerodynamic lift are wrong?
I know there are some big words (and even bigger concepts) in my post but, do you actually understand what I am saying, or are you just sticking your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes, and praying that Jesus will come lift the airplane off the ground and prove you correct? No one can support their argument that the plane will fly because there is no realm of physics in which to find such support.
If you want to know about flight, listen to those who actually know how to fly and why they can.
Here's another thought experiment:
If you can take off from a treadmill, surely you can land on one right? If a plane could hover over a treadmill and touchdown, why even have the wheels and the treadmill in the first place? Why not just have legs and set down on a concrete pad?
Whats that you say? The plane would come in normally but once it hit the treadmill it would cease all forward momentum because the wheels are on the treadmill? This, in effect, is the same thing the Mythbusters investigated in the knight rider myth where they drove the car into and out of a moving tractor-trailer rig. If you'll recall, the car did NOT crash into the front of the trailer.
It's simple physics. A plane cannot fly without airspeed. Period. Every pilot knows that once you drop below a certain airspeed the wings stall. "Stall" is another way of saying "stop flying". IOW, drop like a stone.