our networks
tlcanimal planetscience channelmilitary channeldiscovery health channel
shop now
 

MythBusters

 
    Forums    MythBusters    MythBusters Episode Discussion    Superhero Special - Utility Belt Grappling Hook DISCUSS IT HERE
Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: DCFanMod
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Senior Member
Registered: 08-05-05
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by rrb_brick:
So, if you make a rod-bullet-thingy...with a wire hook on it that can fit into a grapple gun **Cough** Welrod**Cough** that has enough grip space or body to hold a spindle wit the wire, then your set.


The only Welrod I've heard of is the silenced .22 handgun built by the SOE during World War II. Is there another one?

For those calling for a "Plausible" result -- Jamie and Adam were working on the two main components of a Batman-style climbing rig separately. Yes, Jamie's ascender worked fine (and I bet he's keeping it around for future MB or M5 jobs Smile ), but if you can't anchor the far end of the line it doesn't matter how well the ascender works, you ain't going nowhere! Sorry, the rig _as a whole_ is still Busted.
Junior Member
Registered: 09-10-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I was curious why Adam chose to use the device that he did. I would have expected him to use a device that fired the initial projectile at a much higher velocity and use the projectile's force to drive a grappling object into the wall. The exploding nail gun idea was creative, but I think the main projectile lost velocity when the tip exploded. Just a thought.
Junior Member
Registered: 09-10-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by atxmaker:
First, Jamie's ascender: I thought it was spot on, very good for a short timeframe, proof of concept design. I couldn't tell from the video, but it appeared the transmission he used to step down the high-rpm motor was a set of stacked gears. If so, it may have been easier to go with a worm gear; that gives you the drastic reduction in rpm/drastic increase in torque, but in a smaller package with less contact friction loss. Plus, since in this case you don't need or want the power transmission to go the other way, it is a great way of locking the line without relying on the motor, and it allows you to offload the tension from the motor to the thrust bearings on the worm screw. One thing that supprised me was the size of the line used, and/or the line breaking. I would have thought that he would use Spectra, which has a 250 - 300 lb. working load at diameters thinner than cotton kitchen twine. With spectra, you could also decrease the takeup drum diameter for the same line length, which would increase the mechanical advantage (or, really, reduce the negative mechanical advantage by reducing the drum radius) and possibly allow for a smaller motor. Other easy addons to make it smaller given the time and money would be going with Litium Ion/Polymer batteries for increased energy density and possibly moving to an axial winding system (like a spinning reel for fishing, only with the spool instead of the bail turning) to make it more compact.

On Adam's grapple gun: This was one I felt could have benifitted from more definition of needs and more experimentation. Part of the failure of Adam's design was in the modification of the nail gun. 22 blank nail guns rely on a very high peak pressure over a very short period of time (the blank going off) occuring between an object with very little mass (the nail, which also concentrates its force in the small area at the tip during impact) and an object with a much greater mass (the nail gun apparatus + the hammer). It appears Adam stripped as much as possible off of the nail gun to get it to fly right, which would greatly reduce the force transferred to the nail and its ability to be driven into the wall. But even if it had successfully been driven into the wall, we were never shown in testing prior to the final that a properly driven nail in concrete would support the weight of a human (easy: concrete block, nail, put on forklift in workshop, see if Adam can hang from it). To make matters worse, using it the way he did (taught zip line config, tied at both ends) is even worse, because even though the line is tied at both ends, each end is actally pulled *more* than it would be just holding his dead weight alone. Back of the napkin calculations based on what's listed in the Backstage Handbook on bridling lines says that if we assume Adam to be 250lbs or so, the pull on each end of the line would be half that, or 125lbs, *times* the multiplication factor based on the degree of deflection between the lines to the load (Adam) and a straight line drawn between the end points. The smallest angle listed is 10 degrees, with a multiplication factor of 5.76. That means if the line between the tie-off and the nail in the wall was fairly taught initially, at the point Adam stepped off the platform the loading on the nail in the wall was probibally *at least* 720 lbs. For any anchor to have held in that zipline config, it most likely would have had to have been able to hold a verticle dead load (load parallel to nail axis, not perpendicular) equivalent to both Mythbusters, the entire build team, and probablly the Mythtern as well. By establishing exactly what would be necessary at the beginning, it would have made it easier to succeed. Off the top of my head, I think it could have been approached like this: What you want is the greatest purchase in a material such as concrete. You want a deep hole while still using a man-portable device. Therefore, the projectile should be as thin as possible, as dense as possible, and travel as fast as possible. You want the impact end to be designed to penetrate efficiently (check out various projectiles, drill bits, nails, etc, experiment with accute or obtuse angles and various hardened materials), some sort of wedging device after the impact head so that the projectile locks into the hole it has created, and possibly some way to augment the weight, like a lead core or using tungsten. You could base a projectile firing device around a firearm, or go with fast release nitrogen and borrow some of Grant's stuff. You could even go super pressure by using dry ice as your pressure source and creating a super reinforced pressure vessel. I wouldn't mind seeing this one revisited.

-ATX Maker




In your calculations, you seem to have left out one variable when determining the amount of force that the "grapple gun" rig would have to endure. This variable is the effect of acceleration from the initial fall from the top of the ledge to a resting position in the harness. Your assumption of 125 lbs (approx. 57 kg) per end being used as a constant, with an acceleration of 9.8 m/s/s and force being F=ma, you then end up with an initial shock load of approx. 1,231 Pounds (2484.7766 Newtons) as your initial weight. you must plug this into your calculations of the effects of this force upon the rig. This must be doubled to demonstrate the effects on the entire rig for line selection.
I am sure that this equipment could be produced with the proper R&D but it would take quite some time to produce, not to mention a substantial amount of money. I would, however, enjoy seeing the show pull this one off, even if just for bragging rights.
TheMadFabricator
Junior Member
Registered: 09-24-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I am very interested in the testing one of these motors could you please forward the cantact info to me info@90815.com
thank you

quote:
Originally posted by apocalypton:
1. It is a GREAT pleasure to report - with the help of highly skilled engineers from diverse industries - that all basic components of a workable miniature Batman winch have been identified.

2. The newly specified components will work in engineering and building the winch, as well as be a bit smaller in diameter, and also only half as long as the MythBusters right-angle gearmotor unit. That said, we are deeply appreciative of MythBusters' work on this breakthrough, after two years of our own engineering efforts that could not outdo the PowerQuick. The MB achievement - over a matter of only weeks - did what not even a DARPA contract to the aerospace industry was able to accomplish in years!

3. Our engineered winch:
- 0.6 motor horsepower, equal to that of MythBusters.
- Greater output torque, enabling lifting and lowering 350 lbs.
- Full electronic braking.
- Both forward and reverse operation.
- One right-angle, geared speed reducer, replacing three of MB's reducers and gearing.
- Half the weight of the MB gearmotor unit.
- 12 Volts DC, rather than MB's 44 VDC.
- Larger and single, rechargeable battery unit for longer operation.
- Miniature motor controller, plus servo adjuster, a fraction of MB's size.

Keep up the good work, MB - sometimes proving the pros wrong, and inspiring us all.

~Z
Junior Member
Registered: 07-04-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Usually, I think the mythbusters are pretty straight with us, but in this episode I think that some of the accidents were staged.

Given that Jamie and Adam are familiar with the hazards of cable snaps, I can't see Jamie cutting the cable with a knife, especially after the first cable (apparently) snapped to drive home the point on the hazards of severing cables under tension.

I could almost believe that Jamie, didn't think about how to get down, but why did he just happen to carry a knife with him? Unless he planned to use it to cut the cable. Which suggests he at least thought about the hazzards, first.

If this episode were true as written, I think the mythbusters insurance rates would go way up.

I assume that the goal was to a) entertain us and b) drive home some of the hazzards of playing around, but I really felt like I was being manipulated.
Junior Member
Registered: 09-30-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Jamie's comments toward the end of the show beg of a revisit, assuming the fans can produce enough interest and controversy.

Although it's more in Adam's taste to blast a spike to penetrate into a concrete wall, a more diverse angle on the myth would concern end effectors... if that's even the right term to use.

I've seen two types of grappling devices used by Batman. One is the spike, which Adam rather jerry-rigged together, and the other is a claw-like device. The claw is interesting because it was portrayed as having a multitude of "realistic" ways that the grapple could grab onto something. Sometimes the claw simply grabbed the side of building, sometimes it wrapped around a pole or a pipe or some other freestanding object, and on rare occasions, the cable would wrap around an object once and then the claw would swing around and grab the cable to secure it.

The point is, Batman didn't necessarily have ONE super device that worked in all situations. Rather, the utility belt held a vast array of devices and he'd choose the best one for the situation. If the spike couldn't be embedded into a concrete wall, for whatever reason, he'd find another way. He always has another way. He's Batman.
Junior Member
Registered: 10-01-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
A larger caliber blank may have made the 2stage nail driver more effective other than that it was a great solution to the problem, also batman wasn't normally scaling military buildings. Not tensioning the cable was a disappointing oversight; however I'm pretty sure that Adam knew it wasn't going to work and also knew that tensioning the line would pull the nail out of the wall.
Aside from a different design, there is little that can be done to improve this device.
Junior Member
Registered: 12-23-05
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
The tool Adam stripped down for his concrete non-penetrator was a Remington 476 Powder Actuated Fastening Tool. The simplest and cheapest model in the line. Next one up has a built in impactor with a side trigger button. The rest have pistol grips, some also have magazines and semi-auto action. Still have to muzzle load the nails manually one at a time.

They use .22 rimfire blanks with varied amounts of gunpowder for different materials. These shells are also necked down a bit at the 'business end' in addition to being star-crimped and sealed with a dab of paint. The paint is color coded to identify the different power levels. Some of the pistol grip models use even more powerful .27 caliber loads.
Junior Member
Registered: 12-23-05
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I remember seeing something on TV a few years ago about a compact electric ascender with a drum about the size of Jaime's rig, but without the bulky right angle mounted motor and gear reduction.

How I'd design one is I'd put the motor INSIDE the drum and use planetary reduction gears along with a one-way roller clutch for holding position during any stops while going up. Descent control would use dynamic braking by operating the motor as a generator to feed power back to the battery, plus a friction brake. Emergency stopping while descending could be done by engaging the one way roller clutch.
Junior Member
Registered: 04-30-04
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Nothing new here, a working grappling hook has been designed and is currently being tested by the Army for service.
It was listed on popsci.com a while back.
Senior Member
Registered: 10-23-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Jamie made a successfull acent, but the descent, not so pretty!! It looked like someone needed a trip to the doctor!
Junior Member
Registered: 10-27-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
winch

Where can you find a motor like Jamie used?
Junior Member
Registered: 11-07-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
slightly off tompic but they fall arest systems that jamie and adam used during the testing of this myth were used in a very unsafe manner.

the gear they used was all rock climbing gear. I am an ACMG(Association of Canadian Mountain Guides) qualified rock climbing instructer and they way they used that equipment was extremely dangerous. if they took any kind of fall on that gear, the way it was set up, it would have broken. Maybe they should read the packaging or get qualified instruction before they use techinical gear meant to save thier lives
Junior Member
Registered: 11-18-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
A lot of people have commented on the safety aspects related to the climber and how easy it is to build one. On one hand they are correct. A lot of people have attached a capstan to a motor over the years. The earliest one I found was in the 60s. The challenge is to make it go forward and reverse, have a safety factor of 5, and be able to serviver a drop test of one foot with twice the rated load without harming the rope or the climber. There are several other safety requirements that must be met before a technology can go on the market for general use. Jamie's ascender went up, but beyond that someone could get killed. This is one of those "don't try this at home" areas. The PowerQuick that was referred to in the other posts does meet all these safety requirements. Discovery did a piece on "Beyond Tomorrow" on the unit last year. Just do a search for PowerQuick and you will see what I mean.
Junior Member
Registered: 11-20-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
When Adam was deciding what "Myths" to test he commented on the fact that no one can make spiderwebs come out of themselves...I think that if they ever relook at some of these superhero talents they should realize that in the Comic Books Peter Parker aka Spiderman made the web shooters...so maybe they could look into it...
Junior Member
Registered: 11-23-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
The military already has a rapid climbing tool you will find it on this site. http://www.atlasdevices.com
Senior Member
Registered: 02-25-08
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
hmm, let's think for a second. something designed to fire at extremely high velocities, with significant pentration power..? oh i don't know, maybe a ...rail gun, perhaps? in "Batman Begins", the grapple gun is described as magnetically powered, which is exactly how a rail gun works. use a small, powerful electromagnet at the end of a tube, load the grappling device in the back end, and send a pulse through the magnet. i'm not sure how much power would be needed, but i don't doubt that it's possible. there are videos abound on the internets that demonstrate the plausibilty of a handheld railgun.

i can't belive this wasn't mentioned by anyone.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: kim g,
Junior Member
Registered: 06-10-09
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I'm just wondering where they got the dc motor and gears. i need something similar, but much less powerful for part of a robotics obstacle course
Junior Member
Registered: 06-10-09
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I know this thread is old but i was wondering if anyone has some specs on building jamie's ascender or know's where i can get one that small? thanks in advance for all your help
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

    Forums    MythBusters    MythBusters Episode Discussion    Superhero Special - Utility Belt Grappling Hook DISCUSS IT HERE

 
advertisement
 
SITE SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
CREDITS DCL
DISCOVERY SITES Discovery Channel / TLC / Animal Planet / Discovery Health / Science Channel / Planet Green / Discovery Kids / Military Channel /
Investigation Discovery / Discovery Home / HD Theater / Turbo / FitTV / HowStuffWorks / TreeHugger / Petfinder / PetVideo / Discovery Education
VIDEO Discovery Channel Video Player
SHOP Toys / Games / Telescopes / DVD Sets / Planet Earth DVD Sets / Gift Ideas
CUSTOMER SERVICE Contact Us / Free Newsletters / RSS / Sitemap / TV FAQs
CORPORATE Discovery Communications, Inc / Advertising / Careers @ Discovery / Privacy Policy / Visitor Agreement
ATTENTION! We recently updated our privacy policy. The changes are effective as of October 30, 2008. To see the new policy, click here. Questions? See the policy for the contact information.