quote:

You know they are always saying that a person can not invent perpetual motion, but, they can discover it in many forms.

quote:

Originally posted by adr1k:
thevictim, you might be able to help me.

You see, I watched Mythbusters one time when they had a segment on Free Energy. I'm basing my school report on that.

For one of the experiments, MB hooked up a motor to a battery, which then (I think) used what u guys called a "Flywheel energy storage device". Basically it was an electrical circuit that recharged itself.

MB said they got all the information and plans off the internet. I've been searching to no avail. You seem knowledgeable on this topic, so could you please help me? Maybe you know the link to this particular electrical circuit.

Thanks anyway.

quote:

It follows that my concept of charging an object with gravitational energy means literally enhancing its gravity field energy.

quote:

quote:

A nucleus then is basically a superimposition of thousands of photons and so ends up being a dense core of field surrounded by pushed out field occupying the space thousands of times the diameter of the nucleus.

I have a response to this argument:-

WHAT???

quote:

Originally posted by profroger:
Somewhere back in April of 2003 I said that I believed that I could find out what gravity was and a similar challenge was thrown out to me to go ahead and give it a shot.

I did and by November of that same year I wrote my paper telling the full story of that phenomenon. Four years later and, without exception, no scientist or journal would accept it: it is always either confusing, the work of a crazy man or a work inspired by God...but never a work understood or accepted.

Nearly 100 years ago Gravitators were invented and built and till now we are not ready yet for that technology.

Should I now be unwise enough to try to force down the throat of the scientific community a form of infinite energy by building a device that they are not willing to believe in? Would I not be ostracized and thought to be on drugs or crazy or something?

I have better things to do with my life now than to build technology for which the world is not yet ready.

When we become desperate for alternate forms of energy then the time will come for that device to be built...right now it is only talk and entertainment we are about.

Roger

quote:

If the wheel were completely submerged in the stream my question to the class is, will it spin?

quote:

I might donate part of the reward of the Nobel Prize I intend to win to the person who can answer this question correctly.

quote:

Originally posted by profroger:

quote:

you have a pipe and with it create a suction of water. The water spills out of the top of the pipe into the pool of water in which it started. Unless I am mistaken...

*** Well you surely are mistaken because the water will NOT spill out at the top of the pipe.

I am sure many will not even bother to comment on your post for its obvious flaw however I tend to try to make sense even out of what might openly seem as BS. If you use liquefied helium I see the prospect of your technology working seeing it has been proven by a recent Nobel Prize winner that this substance can climb out of a jar even without suction pressure.

Roger

quote:

Originally posted by panther:
Well obviously profonger has never siphoned gas from some ones car, or any liquid for that matter. profonger the funny thing is you try to insult him while hes actualy more right than you have ever been. Only flaw is, if air gets in to your pipe everyones power is gone. Amongst other reasons why it might not work like that, that I dont know about.