this is part of my post at :
"http://community.discoverychannel.ca/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/403105011/m/186104952". I belive that anti-gravity is very CONFIRMED.Read this text and how to make the device at the end:
Well, magnetic field is created from quants just like the light, and that is a fact.Polarised light has some similarities with magnetic field and interact's with strong magnetic field.Magneton and foton are the same tipe of particles.I say what if the graviton is also the same particle as this two but insted of traveling with the speed of light (like the fotons and magnetons) it's actualy stationary?Now if the matery and the energy can't be destroyed or created from nothing, and if in a small sphere you create a magnetic field and a light emision so strong that will eventualy use all of available particles of the moment, so in a way you will destroy the gravity.Simply the building bloks of all magnetic field , gravitation and light are the same AND they are complementary, so if you increase one you will decrease the other.Foton has two states that it can be - stationary and traveling with the speed of light - in the gravity is simply stationary , like a web - so that is why you can't detect gravity, and why gravitational field "grabs" so quickly.The magnetic field is traveling thrue the space with the speed of light but the gravitation is actualy acting instantaniosly.Also in this way you can explain why the foton actualy has some mass (fotoelectric efect, the sun's light is weighting on the earth about 1kg) and still it can travel with the speed of light - it is simply the buildnig block of the gravity - it has the mass of 1 gravitational unit.Look at the experiment of dr. Thomas Towsend Brown and it's asimetric electric field - if you create wery strong asimetric electric (about 15T) field arround a pendulum it will tend to move in one direction and it works in vacuum - why - well there is no explanation but if you accept this than simply it starts to interact with the gravitational field.Also what I've told you about the lightning ball - it is created in the exact situations like my theory predicts that a gravitational field should be weakened - in a thunder and a big storm , witha 1000's of volts and wely strong foton emision (from the air heated to 50 000 degrees.As a mather of fact if you put a plasma in a water you will get an object wery similar to lightning ball(since the air in a lightning ball has losed it's mass the sorounding air acts like the water).Also sinchrothron light.The Cherenkov is wery good example of my theory - simply you have a electron that is traveling faster than the speed of light in a medium.The explanation of this fenomenon is wery poor if you ask me.They say it is the same effect as the bracking the sound barier, a light wave of some type. By my theory when a electron is traveling with the speed of light in this medium , it's gravotational field is actualy becomet a light, the gravitons that were stationary in this moment have becomed a light - fotons and are dispersed aroud the electron in a angle in front and in the same trajectory (in bracking the sound barier the wave is created behind the object).Also if you look at the synchrothron light (for what I think there is not an wery good explenation, and some try to compare it with the Cherenkov's light) it's the same fenomenon.So the basic is - if you calculate teh Einstein's equations (a particle's mass is related to its velocity and the velocity of the speed of light (c)) for a electron or any object traveling with the speed of light you get 0 ZERRO, why mathematicians say that 0 is infinity - it's simply ZERRO..(sorry for the spelling I'm from Macedonia my english is not so good).

OK.So the device should emite very strong light and have a very strong magnetic field. The device should look something like a AIDS virus (search the internet for a picture) - a ball with a loth of spikes. The idea is to create arches of very strong current between the spikes. That way wee create stron light emmision and strong magnetic field. If I'm right the gravitational field will be weaker and the aparatus will lose mass - why - light and the strong magnetic field will steal particles from the gravity - so the gravity.

PLEASE MRS. MYTHBUSTERS TEST MY MYTH, I KNOW IT MAY BE EXPENSIVE BUT ALL IN THE NAME OF SCIENSE AND I GUARANTEE YOU ILL NOT BE DISAPOINTED.

Sincerely:
Kristijan Todoroski
medical student from Skopje,
Macedonia.

You can copy it as many times as you like - it won't become true!!!

Strong light doesn't collect anything. The only effect is that it pushes somnething away. Look up "Solar wind"

Also magnetic fields don't affect matter except magnetic matter.

[quote]Well, magnetic field is created from quants just like the light, and that is a fact.[/quote]

That is completely wrong.
You don't have a clue.
the is no "magnetron" particle.
The rest of your post is even more ridiculous

three_678 I hope you make it in the medical field because you will NEVER make it in physics.

There are so many things wrong with what you said. Magnetic fields are fields, not particles, that is why the say fields.

theTroll

Wow you guys are really just being complete a$$es at this point. Why don't you all just take a chill pill and next time you feel like posting and just blatantly attacking another poster DON'T!

This is no attack. If you post wrong claims, someone will correct them!

This "Painting a fence red with green paint by holding the brush upside down"-physics just hurts! So who attacked us in the first place?

c64 my statement was not addressed at you. However things like
[quote]That is completely wrong.
You don't have a clue.[/quote]
and...
[quote]I hope you make it in the medical field because you will NEVER make it in physics.[/quote]
are just attacks against the op and in my opinion these posts have no place on this forum or anywhere for that matter.

OK one by one - answers for all of your questions:
1. - "Well, magnetic field is created from quants just like the light, and that is a fact" and other stuff that electromagnetic field and light are NOT THE SAME FIELD - ACTUALLY THE SAME.

ANSWER - Even Michel Faraday knew that polarized light interacts with magnetic field 100 f***ing years ago! Here is something to read about at wikipedia:
"In modern physics, the photon is the elementary particle responsible for electromagnetic phenomena. It mediates electromagnetic interactions and makes up all forms of light" - the link is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon.
Also you can find a tons of other websites where you can read that the photon is quant of electromagnetic field and light...

What is next thing that you find wrong with this text?

nati gravity, mon. Irie.

And here is something EXTRA - if you belive in UFO-phenomenon PLEASE READ THIS:
"
Now if someone there belives in the UFO fenomenon - than with this theory you get something extra....
UFO's are usualy glow in a wery bright light, and have a wery strong magnetic field (car's stop running, plains start falling...).Also one wery often heard situation - an UFO is sitting arround the road or a forest, the nearby trees are shaking violently - but the sorounding just arround the UFO is still - why?Well if wee accept that the UFO hass anulated the gravity than the air sorounding teh UFO since it loses all of the mass will go up, and since it doesent have a mass it will not pick up even a single branche in the closest surrouinding.But the sorrounding air that is rushing in to the negative preshure around the UFO will shake the sorrounding trees.
Also the UFO's are silen - now if the air sorrounding the UFO has no mass - it can't conduct sound!
Also my favorite - on a landing area of the UFO's often are found litle microscopic sferes.No one knows what are they(there was a shon even on discovery science about this -in Russia).Well let say an UFO is landing on a hill and shtuts off.Then after a wile it starts again - the strong magnetic field and the light are created from a electric discharges and arches createng wery hight temperatures that melt the sorrounding send and earth.Now when the UFO finaly annulates the gravity this melted send and earth is in a zero gravity atmosfere and takes a shape of sfere.When the UFO flyes avay - the sferic sand and earth fall on the ground.I have meny more of this - but since UFO's are not a fact - if you don't belive in them - just ignore this."

Also I would like tho know what other parts of this text is ridiculous?

Pretty much find it all rediculous, there has bene zero conclusive evidence of UFOs.

What does mass of air have to do with making sound? If the air is there then sound will propegate through it. Is there sound in a thunder strom?

Last I heard trees are not ferris, so why are they shaking? Also if the magnetic field is that strong why are the UFOs not picking up every little ferris particle in the dirt? Take a magnet and roll it around in the dirt and you will see what I mean.

Why is the magnetic field creating discharges of electricy? Electrical fields might do this but magnetic fields won't.

Well that about sums up the ridiculous.

theTroll

Well thetroll you will have to have a little power ov visualisation to understand this: sound is a wave that is spreading thru the air - right. One molecule of air strikes other, and this molecul other and the sound is conducted trhue the air - NOW LET US IMAGINE if the is a part of the air with no mass - this molecule of air will not be able to strike the next molekule , it doesen't have the mass, doesen't have the inertion to do that - if the molecule doesem't have mass it can't move other molecules and therefore IT CAN'T conduct soundm actualy this is wery simple.

Why are the trees shakin - again you need a litle power of visualisation for this - the UFO is standing still, the air aroud his loses mass - this ait that has losed it's mass is lighter than the sorounding air (it actualy has no mass) and therefore gous UP (like a bouble in a water - simpli right), now you can't have a vacoom (the air sorounding the UFO has a presure of 1 athmosfere) so it's rushing into the vacuum sorounding the UFO. Now as soon this air comes near to the UFo it loses it's mass also and goes upwards. Now why the trees shakes - thee air that is rushing towards the UFO hass mass and shakes the trees - the air that sorounds the UFO has no mass and doesent shake anything - it doesen't have any mass and inertion to do that.
I am sorry but i can't explain this much to simpler that this, you will have to visualize this yourself?

For any real question about this text please ask me again I'll be more than happy to answer.

How did you get rid of the mass of the air? If you have anti-gravity you can get rid of the weight of the air but not it's mass.

If the air was rushing by the trees so fast it makes them shake then would there be all kind of debree at the UFO site? Never heard that there is.

I am very good at visualizing things, unless they don't make sense, then I have a few problems.

theTroll

"Why is the magnetic field creating discharges of electricy? Electrical fields might do this but magnetic fields won't.
"
I don't care if the field is magnetic, electrical, electromagnetic or what ever you want it to be - all of them have the same origin - they are quatificated in a for of photon and by my theory the consume photons. When you create magnetic, electric, electromagnetic field it's created from photons. This photons are not created from nothing. Also when this same aparatus that is creating this electromagnetic field is emmiting light (light photons) - all of them consume photons. Now as you can read abouve try to prove that the gravoty is also created from the same quants - photons, and since the energy can't be created from nothing - the strong electromagnetic field and the light that is emited from this aparatus ACTUALY STEAL photon from the gravity, and therefore the gravity weaknenes.

For me this sounds wery logical and I am ready to put my life on it. Mythbusters are crazy enauph to try this - and if this fails I will offer my body to bust myths on it. That's it.

Yes it all sounds logical becuase you don't understand real science. Yeah not very nice to say but in this case it is reality.

theTroll

You also never answered my questions up above.

"How did you get rid of the mass of the air? If you have anti-gravity you can get rid of the weight of the air but not it's mass.
"
----the mass and the weight are presented by the gravitational field. Teka a permanent magnet for example - if you in some method remove it's magnetic field around him (like put him in Faradey cage) it will not be able to atract metal outsite that cage, but it will still have magnetic field. UFO just steals the building blocks of gravity - gravity still exist but just doesen't have any matherial to be created of. Like one man is strait and not gay even if he doesen't get laid for 1 year - he just doesen't have nothing to laid - do you understand. So the gravity and the mass exist but it can't be manifested.

"If the air was rushing by the trees so fast it makes them shake then would there be all kind of debree at the UFO site? Never heard that there is.
"
well I've never heard the opposite also. No one explains where the wind is blowing sorounding the UFO this is my explanation. This is my theory that can explain this fenomenon nad I think it's a good explanation.

"How did you get rid of the mass of the air? If you have anti-gravity you can get rid of the weight of the air but not it's mass.
"
If you put electromagnetic transmiter in Faraday cage it will not have electromagnetic field outsite that cage, but will still have magnetic field. - If you take the gravity out of the molecule - it will have no mass and weight from the outside world - but it will not lose it's mass and weight.

"If the air was rushing by the trees so fast it makes them shake then would there be all kind of debree at the UFO site? Never heard that there is.
"

I've never heard the oposite also. No one says in what direction the air is blowing around the UFO - but that is a nypotesis. It tries to explain one fenomenon as acuarate as it can. This teory do just that.

Real-science - that is obsolete. What is real science, do you think that wee are able to explain the natural fenomenons actualy as they are?
Do you think that when wee are talking about a photon - that is a wery little ball bouncing arround. The "real-sciance" makes aproximations of the real world. There is nothing real about the real-science. In real scinece 1+1=2 in rea; world 1+1 is newer 2 but 2.00000019, or 0,90000323.

Hey, Einstein, nobody has a problem with you re-inventing science. It's just that, doing it here is a complete waste of everybodies time.

I posted this here because I wan't Mythbusters to try and bust this one. Since I don't have to money to do it, and no one else would do that. That's all.