well - have you created a molecule or a body with no gravity to be so shore? Did anyone alse did. I've watched yesterday a show on discovery where one scientis is saying that he created light beam 5 time faster than the speed of light - I guess you will say - THAT'S INPOSSILE DOODE. Why ? What is inertion? I never said that a molecule will lose it's mass, it will still have it's mass, it just will not interact with the soroundings. It will not have inertion - and that's all it need not to conduct sound. Foton doesen't have a mass but it has inertion - the light that is falling on the surface of the earth weights 1kg?! - so it must have inertion to do that! How can a photon do that since it oesen't have a mass - answer me that question. The photon is 1 (one) usint of the gravitational field and that's why it has mass 1 (one) gravitational unit. That's my explanation.

you can't answer that question - because if you say photon has mass - than it can't be traweling with the speed of light, but is a photon is actualy a unit of the gravitational field than it can travel with the speed of light and still have mass of 1 gravitational unit.

Apparently you believe you have the secret to anti-gravity and inertialess propulsion.

In reality you have a bunch of quasi-scientific mumbo-jumbo that when broken down, make no sense at all. Your statement that you haven't read any physics books on this subject is borne out by what you are posting.

You are not postulating something that might be possible if we have the right technology, such as heavier than air flight when others thought it impossible. You are postulating something that simply can not exist as physics states. Merely saying that you don't accept physics is the same as stating you don't accept the need to breathe, so therefore you won't.

But good luck with your endeavor, you're going to need it.

OK, there is a way to test my theory in easier way - as I mentioned in my first post - the Cherenkov's light is actualy the light that an electron is radiating when is traveling with a speed that is faster than the speed of light in that medium. Science explain this fenomenon by comparing it toa plani bracking the sound bariere - a shock wave is creating behind the plane - BUT the problem is that in the Cherenkov's light the wave is creating infront of the electron (just like photons are relised from the electron and traveling by an angle allong with it). Here is the good part - by Einsteinq equations for relativistic speeds - when a body is traveling with the speed of light his mass in infinite, BUT when you actualy so;ve this equations for a body that is traveling with the speed of light you get 0 (ZERRO). Now by my theory when an object is travelng with the speed of light the photons that are actualy creating this gravitational field - becomes light and spread avay from the electron - IN ANGLE anfront of the particle. And here is the experiment - if my theory is true the electrons that are radiating Cherenkov's light have actualy losed theirs mass, because of this the resistance of the electrical current that is traveling thru that medium (the medium in which electrons emite Cherenkov's light) will fall (if it was 5 om it will be 4om for example) - why? - because electrons now don't have any mass and they travel easier thru the molecules of the medium, BUT it will not be 0om - since the electrons still have electrikal charge and electrical field around them and they cant be compresed. Also the temperature of the medium should drop down - SINCE NOW THE ELECTRONS don't have mass BUT THIS ACTUALY MAY NOT HAPPED because of the Cherenkov's emmision that is reasorbed by the sorrounding moleculs what will be responsible for the rising of the temperature. Actualy the resistance of the electrical current shoud go up when the electrons are clossing up on the speed of light in that medium (280 000 km/s for example) , but at one point the restistance SHOULD DROP (how much I don't know). There it is - someone someware maybe already made this experiment and the result's may be on internet - I'VE SEARCHED I CAN'T FIND THEM. If someone conducts this experiments (it shouldn't be to hard to do it) or wind informations on internet that correlate with this that I've just sayd - I MUST CONCLUDE THAT MY THEORY IS WRIGHT. If not I will say to all of you - SORRY. That's it (I will search for this info also).

thetroll - do you have any informations about any changes in a voltage when a Cherenkov radiation appears in one conductor ? - or anyone else have this information?

Einstein said it was imposible for something other than light to travel at the speed of light. He never said it was impossible to travel faster than the speed of light.

I think we should all relax and ask Magneto about this, I am sure he knows.

Careful about waving your arms so much, three. You might take flight!

...unless you were on a treadmill, of course.

...What?

lol, No such thing as anti-gravity. you cannot change gravity itself. the closets anyone is going to get is thrust and repel. No anti-gravity.

, gues no one knows nothing, I gues noone know nothing about anything around here - and guess what - there is no informations on internet about voltage information or measurment cherenkov effect - there is your chance buys to get famous)

Three-678,

Why should we believe that you know anything about advanced physics when you can't even spell.

[quote]Why should we believe that you know anything about advanced physics when you can't even spell.[/quote]

Because English isn't his first language. That being said...it still doesn't negate my doubt that he knows what he's talking about. Why would this be an idea for MythBusters when he could be actively researching this himself?

[quote][quote]Why should we believe that you know anything about advanced physics when you can't even spell.[/quote]

Because English isn't his first language. That being said...it still doesn't negate my doubt that he knows what he's talking about. Why would this be an idea for MythBusters when he could be actively researching this himself
[/quote/]
he says that theres squat on the web about it but there is

Found something on net - I think they talk about voltage peaks in superconductors that they try to explain with some resonance with the Cherenkov cone:
"http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PhRvB..6012419I"
can't find nothing more.

Actualy here is some litle text about changes whena conductor is bombared with high energy electrons (that can produce Cherenkov light). My idea was wrong actualy - the experiment with CHerenkov leffect can't be done as I think it can since that effect is only produced in materials with enormes electrical resistance. Here is the link:
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v103/i5/p1193_1
And for light transmitting materials there is a change in transmission

To bad Mythbusters doesen't want to test my myth I was thinking to give them the first ride and a spin around the moon on my brand new UFO (:-D

mythbusters are getting better by the minute men,

Oh, leave it alone, you see how old this thread is?

Well I can't leave i alone man , sorry for my bad language in this forum but I really thik there is something to it. Well I was wrong about the cherenkov radiation and the way's to test that by reducing the resistance of the electrical current but after all my idea explains so much for the UFO fenomenon just read the first page. Well ....

A four month old thread self-bump. Is that a new record?