our networks
tlcanimal planetscience channelmilitary channeldiscovery health channel
shop now
 

MythBusters

 
    Forums    MythBusters    Ideas: Military/Weapons    .50 BMG Reality vs. Myth
Page 1 2 3 4 ... 21

Moderators: DCFanMod
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Senior Member
Registered: 05-23-07
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Every day the message board is filled with questions about the .50 cal. Many fantastic feats have been attributes to this cartridge. From blowing people apart to pentrating bank vaults to blowing skin off with neaqr misses.

The .50 BMG cartridge has been around for almost 90 years. In that time it has seen service in every conflict the United States has been involved in since WWII. Thousands upon thousands of vehicles, structures and people have been shot with the .50.

Prior to the standardization of 10% ballistic gelatin as a test media most terminal ballistics information was based on annecdotal evidence from the battlefield and some live animal testing. Due to the fog of war, battlefield reports must be taken with a grain of salt and soldiers will often exagerate events. Today we can compare the relative effectiveness of cartridges and predict their terminal performance much more exactly than ever before.

Myth 1: The .50 will rip skin off with a near miss.

Fact: The only way a bullet will ever hurt you is by hitting you. The lack of destructive shockwave is clearly evideny when shooting paper targets. The holes in the paper are caliber sized and no additional damage to the target is seen.
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:-VhkUe_PlUjmjM:http...mg/asrul50st100a.JPG
(note clean target holes)

If shockwave effect existed for the .50 it should exist for all other bullets traveling at the same speed. Note that 30-06 and .50 BMG have similar muzzle velocities difference in bullet diamter is less than .2".

http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:XwScgrafjAj4EM:http...0408%2520Cheytac.JPG

Myth 2: .50 can blow people apart.

Fact: Although the .50 can cause horrific wounds it can not blow a grown man in half.

Here is picture of the wound channel in gelatin for a .50 BMG .750gr A-Max.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/images/50blka.jpg

Note maximum diameter of temporary cavity is ~7.5" occuring at a depth of 8". This occurs as the bullet begins to yaw.

Here is a picture of various .308 loads using the Hornady A-Max bullets.

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/docgkr/myhomepage/308_TAP_comparison.jpg

Note that temporary cavity diameter is nearly identical, but occuring at a much shallower depth. The .308 A-Max bullets expand and fragment.

Note that the permanent cavity created by the .50 is fairly small early in the wound track. If the .50 passes through a limb without yawing or hitting bone the effect should be similar to a 1/2" icepick wound. However if the round strikes the torso of a thick chested individual it may begin to yaw within the body and produce a large temporary cavity near the end of the wound track. This would result in a massive exit wound and is likely the basis for the myth of people being blown in half.

Myth 3: The .50 can penetrate bank vaults.

Fact: Even .50 AP can only penetrate 1" of rolled armor. As far as concrete goes.

Number of rounds needed to penetrate a reinforced concrete wall at 25° obliquity. Wall Thickness 109 yd (100 m) Range 219 yd (200 m) Range
2 ft (0.6 m) 300 rounds 1,200 rounds
3 ft (0.9 m) 450 rounds 1,800 rounds
4 ft (1.2 m) 600 rounds 2,400 rounds

In other words in order to penetrate a bank vault we need thousands of rounds of ammunition and an alternate method to cut through the rebar.

Also see: http://democrats.reform.house.gov/features/fifty_caliber/guns_marine_video.rm

Myth: the .50 is magical

Fact: .50 is an excelent tool just like any other.
Senior Member
Registered: 03-10-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Good post brother.
Senior Member
Registered: 10-28-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Nice effort, bernieb90. But I suspect the only people who read it are the ones that already know. We can hope one or two others might actually read it too, though. Even one less .50 thread a day would be a nice break.
Junior Member
Registered: 02-15-08
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Very nice. I was expecting to read a bunch of obsurd claims that people have in this one. Just the opposite.
Senior Member
Registered: 10-03-06
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
This needs to be sticky'd...
If it is always on top, a couple people might notice it.
Senior Member
Registered: 11-16-05
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Great post Bernieb90!

That took you some time to research, thanks.

I agree, it should be a sticky, so we can refer the "Magic .50" folks to it.
Senior Member
Registered: 03-14-04
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
You know Bernie, this insistence on including facts, citing sources, and providing proof of statements has just GOT to stop.

Why, it's almost as if you took the time to research this and provided realistic sources. Now how is that going to look when someone wants to make a wild claim based on the tried and true "well, I heard this from my friend's brother's uncle who knows someone who was dating a guy who knew someone who was in the army."

Sheesh Bernie, you gots your nerve.

Facts indeed.
Junior Member
Registered: 08-21-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
My only qualm was when you are comparing the .45 and the .50 and point out there is a .2" difference. I don't know anything about guns and never claim to but I am a precision metal worker and am pretty sure that .2" is pretty close to a quarter inch. That's not "really close" when your comparing bullets. Please explain to me because I just wanna know.
Senior Member
Registered: 10-28-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
It was .30 and .50, not .45 and .50.

But one point is in the wound size. A .30 makes just under a .30" entry and a .50 makes just under a .50" entry.

That .20" isn't the difference between a small entry hole and "blowing a man in half".

Nor is it the difference in any "shock wave" the bullet might be making in the air. From aerodynamics, the shock wave depends on the pressure differences due to the speed compared to the speed of sound. The angle of the shock wave only depends on the speed, not the shape or size. The pressure front differences from a .30 and a .50 is rather negligible. A .30 and a .50 at the same speed should provide essentially the same shockwave.
Senior Member
Registered: 05-23-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Exactly correct roofingguy.

Here is some additional wound ballistics information and page 7 of the document has an excellent view of the wound profile of the .50 BMG in relation to an average human. This document also provides the rationale behind JAG approval for the use of the .50 against personell.

http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2001smallarms/parks2.pdf
Senior Member
Registered: 03-10-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Hey Bernie. That block of gel that he is resting his hand on. Was that one they shot with the MK211?
Senior Member
Registered: 05-13-06
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Excellent post Bernie!
Senior Member
Registered: 07-13-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by typical_is_back_again:
Good post brother.
seconded
Senior Member
Registered: 10-28-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by bernieb90:
Every day the message board is filled with questions about the .50 cal. Many fantastic feats have been attributes to this cartridge. From blowing people apart to pentrating bank vaults to blowing skin off with neaqr misses.

The .50 BMG cartridge has been around for almost 90 years. In that time it has seen service in every conflict the United States has been involved in since WWII. Thousands upon thousands of vehicles, structures and people have been shot with the .50.

Prior to the standardization of 10% ballistic gelatin as a test media most terminal ballistics information was based on annecdotal evidence from the battlefield and some live animal testing. Due to the fog of war, battlefield reports must be taken with a grain of salt and soldiers will often exagerate events. Today we can compare the relative effectiveness of cartridges and predict their terminal performance much more exactly than ever before.

Myth 1: The .50 will rip skin off with a near miss.

Fact: The only way a bullet will ever hurt you is by hitting you. The lack of destructive shockwave is clearly evideny when shooting paper targets. The holes in the paper are caliber sized and no additional damage to the target is seen.
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:-VhkUe_PlUjmjM:http...mg/asrul50st100a.JPG
(note clean target holes)

If shockwave effect existed for the .50 it should exist for all other bullets traveling at the same speed. Note that 30-06 and .50 BMG have similar muzzle velocities difference in bullet diamter is less than .2".

http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:XwScgrafjAj4EM:http...0408%2520Cheytac.JPG

Myth 2: .50 can blow people apart.

Fact: Although the .50 can cause horrific wounds it can not blow a grown man in half.

Here is picture of the wound channel in gelatin for a .50 BMG .750gr A-Max.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/images/50blka.jpg

Note maximum diameter of temporary cavity is ~7.5" occuring at a depth of 8". This occurs as the bullet begins to yaw.

Here is a picture of various .308 loads using the Hornady A-Max bullets.

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/docgkr/myhomepage/308_TAP_comparison.jpg

Note that temporary cavity diameter is nearly identical, but occuring at a much shallower depth. The .308 A-Max bullets expand and fragment.

Note that the permanent cavity created by the .50 is fairly small early in the wound track. If the .50 passes through a limb without yawing or hitting bone the effect should be similar to a 1/2" icepick wound. However if the round strikes the torso of a thick chested individual it may begin to yaw within the body and produce a large temporary cavity near the end of the wound track. This would result in a massive exit wound and is likely the basis for the myth of people being blown in half.

Myth 3: The .50 can penetrate bank vaults.

Fact: Even .50 AP can only penetrate 1" of rolled armor. As far as concrete goes.

Number of rounds needed to penetrate a reinforced concrete wall at 25° obliquity. Wall Thickness 109 yd (100 m) Range 219 yd (200 m) Range
2 ft (0.6 m) 300 rounds 1,200 rounds
3 ft (0.9 m) 450 rounds 1,800 rounds
4 ft (1.2 m) 600 rounds 2,400 rounds

In other words in order to penetrate a bank vault we need thousands of rounds of ammunition and an alternate method to cut through the rebar.

Also see: http://democrats.reform.house.gov/features/fifty_caliber/guns_marine_video.rm

Myth: the .50 is magical

Fact: .50 is an excelent tool just like any other.


Shameless bump, designed to defeat those who won't scroll up to the OP.
Senior Member
Registered: 01-17-05
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Not all cartridges are created equal take a .460 S&W mag, a .454 casull and a .45 colt traditional interchangeable cartridges but they do not have the same impact force.
Senior Member
Registered: 02-22-08
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Wow - lots to read; liked the amount of data provided.
Senior Member
Registered: 03-10-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
quote:
Originally posted by bernieb90:
Every day the message board is filled with questions about the .50 cal. Many fantastic feats have been attributes to this cartridge. From blowing people apart to pentrating bank vaults to blowing skin off with neaqr misses.

The .50 BMG cartridge has been around for almost 90 years. In that time it has seen service in every conflict the United States has been involved in since WWII. Thousands upon thousands of vehicles, structures and people have been shot with the .50.

Prior to the standardization of 10% ballistic gelatin as a test media most terminal ballistics information was based on annecdotal evidence from the battlefield and some live animal testing. Due to the fog of war, battlefield reports must be taken with a grain of salt and soldiers will often exagerate events. Today we can compare the relative effectiveness of cartridges and predict their terminal performance much more exactly than ever before.

Myth 1: The .50 will rip skin off with a near miss.

Fact: The only way a bullet will ever hurt you is by hitting you. The lack of destructive shockwave is clearly evideny when shooting paper targets. The holes in the paper are caliber sized and no additional damage to the target is seen.
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:-VhkUe_PlUjmjM:http...mg/asrul50st100a.JPG
(note clean target holes)

If shockwave effect existed for the .50 it should exist for all other bullets traveling at the same speed. Note that 30-06 and .50 BMG have similar muzzle velocities difference in bullet diamter is less than .2".

http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:XwScgrafjAj4EM:http...0408%2520Cheytac.JPG

Myth 2: .50 can blow people apart.

Fact: Although the .50 can cause horrific wounds it can not blow a grown man in half.

Here is picture of the wound channel in gelatin for a .50 BMG .750gr A-Max.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/images/50blka.jpg

Note maximum diameter of temporary cavity is ~7.5" occuring at a depth of 8". This occurs as the bullet begins to yaw.

Here is a picture of various .308 loads using the Hornady A-Max bullets.

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/docgkr/myhomepage/308_TAP_comparison.jpg

Note that temporary cavity diameter is nearly identical, but occuring at a much shallower depth. The .308 A-Max bullets expand and fragment.

Note that the permanent cavity created by the .50 is fairly small early in the wound track. If the .50 passes through a limb without yawing or hitting bone the effect should be similar to a 1/2" icepick wound. However if the round strikes the torso of a thick chested individual it may begin to yaw within the body and produce a large temporary cavity near the end of the wound track. This would result in a massive exit wound and is likely the basis for the myth of people being blown in half.

Myth 3: The .50 can penetrate bank vaults.

Fact: Even .50 AP can only penetrate 1" of rolled armor. As far as concrete goes.

Number of rounds needed to penetrate a reinforced concrete wall at 25° obliquity. Wall Thickness 109 yd (100 m) Range 219 yd (200 m) Range
2 ft (0.6 m) 300 rounds 1,200 rounds
3 ft (0.9 m) 450 rounds 1,800 rounds
4 ft (1.2 m) 600 rounds 2,400 rounds

In other words in order to penetrate a bank vault we need thousands of rounds of ammunition and an alternate method to cut through the rebar.

Also see: http://democrats.reform.house.gov/features/fifty_caliber/guns_marine_video.rm

Myth: the .50 is magical

Fact: .50 is an excelent tool just like any other.



Shameless bump, designed to defeat those who won't scroll up to the OP.



Same here!

Oh look, its a sticky now. I wonder how that happened Smile?

Guess our benevolent Moderator liked what she saw here.
Junior Member
Registered: 06-12-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Let's see now if I can remember some of the things my Mah Deuce mounted on the turret of my M-41 tank did.

Oh yes, it will cut down trees - with ease. Please take note of that when Mythbusters used those small caliber machineguns to cut down trees. One foot diameter telephone poles set up as targets were really fun.

Model M-2 .50 caliber BALL (lead filled copper jacket) will NOT penetrate 1-inch rolled armor. Only .75-inch HY-80 steel is needed (the thickness of armor I was tasked to design for the LHA-1, DD-963, and BB-61 class ships when working for the Navy).

BUT, in WW II special .50 caliber armor piercing, high explosive rounds were developed to blow up German armored locomotives.
Then they found that round did a great job on both German and Japanese aircraft. I don't think that model of round is issued anymore. We ran out of Me-109s and Zekes to shoot at.

A co-worker said he had the most fun in Viet Nam when he was issued a few boxes of that ammo and he felled an entire clump of woods (along with VC hiding behind the trees).

A special M-20 & Mk 211 Armor Piercing, Incendiary round has been developed both for penetrating thick stuff (like walls, personnel carriers, etc.) and our snipers use it to "neutralize" individual enemy "soldkers".

That started in the Korean War when a soldier mated a .50 caliber barrel to a Russian anti-tank gun receiver and mounted a 20 power scope on it. He was taking out North Koreans and Chinese "volunteers" at 1,500 yards - WITH the high explosive rounds.
Senior Member
Registered: 03-10-07
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
BUT, in WW II special .50 caliber armor piercing, high explosive rounds were developed to blow up German armored locomotives.


Nomenclature please.


quote:
That started in the Korean War when a soldier mated a .50 caliber barrel to a Russian anti-tank gun receiver and mounted a 20 power scope on it. He was taking out North Koreans and Chinese "volunteers" at 1,500 yards - WITH the high explosive rounds.


[quote]and our snipers use it to "neutralize" individual enemy "soldkers".[/qutoe]

The MK211 is not a round of choice for STA, it does not have the best trajectory in the world. But then again the SASR isn't all that accurate either. It can be used against personnel, but there are other rounds that are better suited for the job. Besides, through testing, we found that the 211 will not reliabaly detonate inside a human target.
That was in Vietnam, and it was not a Russian anti-tank gun that he used.
Senior Member
Registered: 11-16-05
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
That started in the Korean War when a soldier mated a .50 caliber barrel to a Russian anti-tank gun receiver and mounted a 20 power scope on it. He was taking out North Koreans and Chinese "volunteers" at 1,500 yards - WITH the high explosive rounds.



Well, that's a new one on me, here all the time I thought it was Gunnery Sergeant Carlos Hathcock in Vietnam that first mounted a scope on a .50 cal.
  Powered by Eve Community Page 1 2 3 4 ... 21 
 

    Forums    MythBusters    Ideas: Military/Weapons    .50 BMG Reality vs. Myth

 
advertisement
 
SITE SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTERS
CREDITS DCL
DISCOVERY SITES Discovery Channel / TLC / Animal Planet / Discovery Health / Science Channel / Planet Green / Discovery Kids / Military Channel /
Investigation Discovery / Discovery Home / HD Theater / Turbo / FitTV / HowStuffWorks / TreeHugger / Petfinder / PetVideo / Discovery Education
VIDEO Discovery Channel Video Player
SHOP Toys / Games / Telescopes / DVD Sets / Planet Earth DVD Sets / Gift Ideas
CUSTOMER SERVICE Contact Us / Free Newsletters / RSS / Sitemap / TV FAQs
CORPORATE Discovery Communications, Inc / Advertising / Careers @ Discovery / Privacy Policy / Visitor Agreement
ATTENTION! We recently updated our privacy policy. The changes are effective as of October 30, 2008. To see the new policy, click here. Questions? See the policy for the contact information.